Roles of molecular chaperones in pancreatic secretion and their involvement in intestinal absorption
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This review focuses on the contribution of molecular chaperones in the secretory process of digestive enzymes and their interaction with enterocytes. By using biochemistry and immunocytochemistry, we have shown that Grp94, Cpn10, Cpn60, and protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) are present all along the rough endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi-granule secretory pathway of the pancreatic acinar cells and are secreted into the acinar lumen. Two other molecular chaperones, Grp78 and the Hsp70, appear to be restricted to the rough endoplasmic reticulum and the trans-Golgi apparatus, respectively. We have found that chaperones can be associated with pancreatic enzymes along the secretory pathway. Indeed, double immunogold and immunocoprecipitation revealed an association between Cpn60 and the colipase-dependent lipase (CDL) and between Grp94 and the bile salt-dependent lipase (BSDL). These complexes are secreted into the acinar lumen and diverted to the duodenal lumen. These findings led us to investigate these enzyme-chaperone complexes in intestinal tissue. Grp94, Cpn60, and PDI are present on microvilli and on the endosomal compartment of enterocytes. Furthermore, we have shown that the Grp94-BSDL complexes are internalized by enterocytes through classical endocytosis. Upon dissociation of the BSDL-Grp94 complex in the late endosome, BSDL is transferred to the basolateral membrane. We propose that Grp94 interacts with specific receptors and/or could force the associated protein to adopt a specific conformation that allows its binding to corresponding membrane receptors and its internalization by enterocytes. These two hypotheses need not to be exclusive. The existence of such a pancreatic secretion-intestinal absorption link speaks in favor of a coordinated functional connection between these two entities, through molecular chaperones, in order to optimize intestinal activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".