MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068912705 · doi:10.1117/12.790006

Systems and control software for the Atacama Cosmology Telescope

2008· article· en· W2068912705 on OpenAlexaff
Eric R. Switzer, Christine A. Allen, M. Amiri, John W. Appel, E. S. Battistelli, B. Burger, J. A. Chervenak, Alex Dahlen, S. Das, Michelle Devlin, Simon Dicker, W. B. Doriese, Rolando Dünner, Thomas Essinger-Hileman, Xiaofeng Gao, M. Halpern, Matthew Hasselfield, G. C. Hilton, Adam D. Hincks, K. D. Irwin, S. Knotek, R. P. Fisher, J. W. Fowler, N. Jarosik, Madhuri Kaul, Jeff Klein, Janice Lau, M. Limon, Robert H. Lupton, Tobias A. Marriage, Krista Martocci, S. H. Moseley, C. B. Netterfield, Michael D. Niemack, Michael R. Nolta, Lyman A. Page, Lucas Parker, Beth Reid, C. D. Reintsema, Audrey Sederberg, Jonathan Sievers, David N. Spergel, Suzanne T. Staggs, O. R. Stryzak, Daniel S. Swetz, Robert Thornton, Edward J. Wollack, Yue Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconducting and THz Device Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersGoddard Space Flight CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPrinceton UniversityCardiff UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCosmic microwave backgroundTelescopeBolometerPhysicsUpgradeCosmologyAstronomySoftwareTransition edge sensorAstrophysicsRemote sensingDetectorComputer scienceOpticsAnisotropyOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) is designed to measure temperature anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) at arcminute resolution. It is the first CMB experiment to employ a 32×32 close-packed array of free-space-coupled transition-edge superconducting bolometers. We describe the organization of the telescope systems and software for autonomous, scheduled operations. When paired with real-time data streaming and display, we are able to operate the telescope at the remote site in the Chilean Altiplano via the Internet from North America. The telescope had a data rate of 70 GB/day in the 2007 season, and the 2008 upgrade to three arrays will bring this to 210 GB/day.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0870.056

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSuperconducting and THz Device TechnologyFrench-language works237,207