MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068917916 · doi:10.1063/1.4890829

Numerical nonlinear analysis of subcritical Rayleigh-Bénard convection in a horizontal confined enclosure filled with non-Newtonian fluids

2014· article· en· W2068917916 on OpenAlexaff
Ouahiba Benouared, Mahmoud Mamou, Noureddine Aït Messaoudène

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrandtl numberMechanicsPhysicsRayleigh numberConvectionCombined forced and natural convectionNatural convectionThermodynamicsNewtonian fluid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-Newtonian subcritical convection in a Rayleigh-Bénard configuration was investigated numerically, using rigid boundary conditions. The flow configuration consisted of a finite aspect ratio enclosure subject to a vertical temperature gradient, which was established by heating and cooling the lower and the upper walls by either a constant heat flux or by applying constant temperatures. The non-Newtonian fluid viscosity was modeled using the Carreau-Yasuda model. The convective flow was governed by the conservation equations, which were solved numerically using a finite difference method with a time-accurate scheme. For a shallow enclosure, when the walls were subject to constant heat fluxes, an asymptotic solution was derived assuming a parallel flow behavior. A comparison between the numerical and asymptotic solutions was performed. The effects of the controlling parameters, namely, the Rayleigh and the Prandtl numbers, and the fluid rheological parameters on the onset of subcritical convective flow were investigated. The threshold for the onset of subcritical convection was found to be well below the threshold of stationary convection and decreased considerably (with the fluid rheological parameters variation) as the fluid became more and more shear thinning. Depending on the governing parameters, steady and unsteady-periodic flow solutions were possible. Within a square enclosure with slip or no-slip vertical walls, maintaining the active walls at a constant heat flux or at constant temperature, the rheological subcritical flow behavior remained qualitatively the same, but led to different subcritical convection thresholds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207