The effect of energetic condition on growth dynamics and health of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prolonged starvation resulting in sublethal condition factor values was hypothesized to have a detrimental effect on short-term growth capacity upon refeeding. Cod (Gadus morhua) were food-deprived and their length and mass measured before refeeding and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks of ad libitum feeding. Total mass increase during the first 3 weeks of feeding was greatest in fish with a higher initial condition factor. The reverse situation was observed during the last 3 weeks of feeding. Specific growth rate peaked in the period from week 4 to week 6, except in cod with the highest condition factor for which a steady decline in specific growth rate was observed, and was not influenced by the condition factor at the start of the feeding period. Total mass increase over 12 weeks was also not influenced by initial condition factor. Thus by the end of the experiment, condition factors were lowest in fish with initially low condition factors. The hepatosomatic index and gonadosomatic index did not differ at the end of the experiment, but the proportion of mature cod increased with increasing initial condition factor. A disease outbreak caused significant mortalities among fish shortly after the start of the feeding period. Forty-one percent of the fish had died after 84 days. No mortality was observed among fish that had started the experiment with the highest condition factor. Mortality was inversely related to initial condition factor. Growth was examined for survivors exclusively. Poor condition in wild fish may increase vulnerability to diseases and compensatory growth may not allow cod with low condition factors to fully recover unless food availability remains high over a long period of time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".