MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068940851 · doi:10.1115/1.1460910

The Interface Crack Problem of Bonded Piezoelectric and Elastic Half-Space Under Transient Electromechanical Loads

2002· article· en· W2068940851 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Mechanics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric displacement fieldBoundary value problemPiezoelectricityChebyshev polynomialsIntegral equationMathematical analysisMaterials scienceStress intensity factorSingular integralHalf-spaceIntegral transformTransient (computer programming)Boundary (topology)Displacement (psychology)Electric-field integral equationMechanicsMathematicsFracture mechanicsPhysicsComposite materialComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interface crack problem of bonded piezoelectric and elastic half-space under transient electromechanical loads is considered. Both the permeable and impermeable boundary conditions are examined and discussed. Based on the use of integral transform techniques, the problem is reduced either to a singular integral equation for the permeable boundary condition or to two coupled singular integral equations for the impermeable boundary condition, which can be solved using Chebyshev polynomial expansions. Numerical results are provided to show the effect of the applied electric fields, the electric boundary conditions along the crack faces and a free surface on the resulting dynamic stress intensity factor and electric displacement intensity factor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it