MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068948194 · doi:10.1063/1.1745106

Metal–organic–metal cathode for high-contrast organic light-emitting diodes

2004· article· en· W2068948194 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaodong Feng, R. S. Khangura, Zhengliang Lü

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathodeMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsOLEDElectrodeDiodeLayer (electronics)LuminanceMetalLight-emitting diodeOpticsChemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organic light-emitting diodes have been fabricated using a stacked metal–organic–metal cathode structure. The first metal layer is embedded approximately between an emission layer and an electron transport layer serving as a floating electron injection electrode. The second metal layer is a terminal layer serving as a contacting electrode. The optical transmission of the embedded electrode and the optical path between the two electrodes were used together to maximize destructive optical interference, thus rendering the cathode nonreflective. These devices also showed excellent diode characteristics; for example, a luminance of 100 cd/m2 at ∼3 V. Optical reflectance in the visible spectrum for the diodes was found to be reduced from ∼80% on conventional devices to ∼20% on devices with the metal–organic–metal cathode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes ResearchFrench-language works237,207