Micropropagation with a novel pattern of adventitious rooting in Formosan sweetgum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cultures of the Formosan sweetgum (Liquidambar formosana Hance) were established from axillary buds of intact plants and from petiole segments of in vitro grown leaves. Petiole segments were generally slower than axillary buds to form multiple shoot cultures. Thidiazuron in combination with 6-benzylaminopurine produced on average up to 9.4 shoots per explant. Shoot elongation was significantly affected by the concentration of 6-benzylaminopurine, regardless of auxin addition to the medium. Adventitious rooting occurred up to 90%. An unexpected pattern of adventitious rhizogenesis was observed from the aerial parts of microshoots not in contact with the rooting medium, including leaf blades and petiole axils. In vitro adventitious root formation from the leaf blade was associated with parenchyma cells surrounding the main vein. The regenerated plants established ex vitro did not show any detectable morphological variation and no aerial roots were formed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".