MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068957851 · doi:10.1145/1268769.1268770

An accurate nonuniform fourier transform for SPRITE magnetic resonance imaging data

2007· article· en· W2068957851 on OpenAlexaff
James Rioux, Meghan E. Halse, Eric Aubanel, Bruce J. Balcom, J. Kaffanke, Sandro Romanzetti, Thomas Dierkes, N. Jon Shah

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmFourier transformComputer scienceInterpolation (computer graphics)Discrete Fourier transform (general)Fast Fourier transformk-spacePhase correlationSprite (computer graphics)Fourier analysisFractional Fourier transformComputer visionMathematicsMathematical analysisImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new algorithm is proposed for computing the discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) of purely phase encoded data acquired during Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) experiments. These experiments use the SPRITE (Single Point Ramped Imaging with T 1 Enhancement) method and multiple-point acquisition, sampling data in a nonuniform manner that prohibits reconstruction by fast Fourier transform. The chirp z-transform algorithm of Rabiner, Schafer, and Rader can be combined with phase corrections to compute the DFT of this data to extremely high accuracy. This algorithm outperforms the interpolation methods that are traditionally used to process nonuniform data, both in terms of execution time and in terms of accuracy as compared to the DFT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Mathematical SoftwareSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207