MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of NO Annealing on 6H- and 4H-SiC MOS Interface States

2010· article· en· W2068983601 on OpenAlexaff
A. F. Basile, John Rozen, X.D. Chen, Sarit Dhar, John R. Williams, L. C. Feldman, P. M. Mooney

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceAnnealing (glass)Conduction bandDeep-level transient spectroscopySemiconductorCapacitanceBand gapAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsCondensed matter physicsSiliconMetallurgyElectronPhysical chemistryElectrodeChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrical properties of the SiC/SiO2 interface resulting from oxidation of the n-type 6H-SiC polytype were studied by hi-lo CV, temperature dependent CV and constant capacitance deep level transient spectroscopy (CCDLTS) techniques. Several trap species differing in energy and capture cross section were identified. A trap distribution at 0.5 eV below the 6H-SiC conduction band energy and a shallower density of states in both the 6H and 4H polytyes are passivated by post-oxidation NO annealing. However, other ultra-shallow and deeper defect distributions remain after nitridation. The latter may originate from semiconductor traps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207