Colocalization of Intracellular Osteopontin With CD44 Is Associated With Migration, Cell Fusion, and Resorption in Osteoclasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although osteopontin (OPN) is recognized generally as a secreted protein, an intracellular form of osteopontin (iOPN), associated with the CD44 complex, has been identified in migrating fibroblastic cells. Because both OPN and CD44 are expressed at high levels in osteoclasts, we have used double immunofluorescence analysis and confocal microscopy to determine whether colocalization of these proteins has functional significance in the formation and activity of osteoclasts. Analysis of rat bone marrow-derived osteoclasts revealed strong surface staining for CD44 and beta1- and beta3-integrins, whereas little or no staining for OPN or bone sialoprotein (BSP) was observed in nonpermeabilized cells. In permeabilized perfusion osteoclasts and multinucleated osteoclasts, staining for OPN and CD44 was prominent in cell processes, including filopodia and pseudopodia. Confocal microscopy revealed a high degree of colocalization of OPN with CD44 in motile osteoclasts. In cells treated with cycloheximide (CHX), perinuclear staining for OPN and BSP was lost, but iOPN staining was retained within cell processes. In osteoclasts generated from the OPN-null and CD44-null mice, cell spreading and protrusion of pseudopodia were reduced and cell fusion was impaired. Moreover, osteoclast motility and resorptive activity were significantly compromised. Although the area resorbed by OPN-null osteoclasts could be rescued partially by exogenous OPN, the resorption depth was not affected. These studies have identified an intracellular form of OPN, colocalizing with CD44 in cell processes, that appears to function in the formation and activity of osteoclasts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".