MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069005389 · doi:10.1017/s0022112001004256

Robust feedback control of Rayleigh–Bénard convection

2001· article· en· W2069005389 on OpenAlexaff
A. C. Or, Luca Cortelezzi, Jason L. Speyer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear-quadratic-Gaussian controlControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)PlanarRayleigh scatteringConvectionPhysicsLinear-quadratic regulatorShadowgraphFeedback controlWhite noiseComputer scienceOptimal controlMathematicsMechanicsControl engineeringControl (management)EngineeringOpticsMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the application of linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) feedback control, or, in modern terms, [Hscr ]2 control, to the stabilization of the no-motion state against the onset of Rayleigh–Bénard convection in an infinite layer of Boussinesq fluid. We use two sensing and actuating methods: the planar sensor model (Tang & Bau 1993, 1994), and the shadowgraph model (Howle 1997a). By extending the planar sensor model to the multi-sensor case, it is shown that a LQG controller is capable of stabilizing the no-motion state up to 14.5 times the critical Rayleigh number. We characterize the robustness of the controller with respect to parameter uncertainties, unmodelled dynamics. Results indicate that the LQG controller provides robust performances even at high Rayleigh numbers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207