MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069013546 · doi:10.1139/p02-011

Absolute wavelength measurement of the Lyman-α transition of hydrogen-like silicon

2002· article· en· W2069013546 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. Tschischgale, D. Klöpfel, P. Beiersdörfer, G. V. Brown, E. Förster, H. Schulte‐Schrepping, S. B. Utter

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBasic Energy SciencesDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsWavelengthAtomic physicsSiliconElectron beam ion trapCrystal (programming language)HydrogenOpticsIonElectronLamb shiftCathode rayOptoelectronicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The wavelengths of the 1s1/2–2p1/2 and 1s1/2–2p3/2 Lyman-α transitions have been measured in hydrogenic silicon with an accuracy of 70 ppm. The measurement was carried out with an electron-beam ion trap with a calibrated double-faced monolithic crystal that enabled absolute measurements of the transition wavelengths. The values for the Lyman-α wavelengths are λLyα1 = 6.180 49(44) Å and λLyα2 = 6.185 56(66) Å. The wavelengths are in good agreement with calculations and allow a determination of the 1s Lamb shift to within 28% in a region that has received little experimental attention. PACS Nos.:32.30Rj, 31.30Jv

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207