MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069026546 · doi:10.3168/jds.2013-6664

Journal of Dairy Science® 2012 Editorial Report

2013· editorial· en· W2069026546 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roger D. Shanks

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2013
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCassava research and cyanide
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceWorkloadQuality (philosophy)PollockPsychologyManagementHistoryComputer scienceArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This has been a tumultuous year of records. The June 2012 issue of Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) set a record for the most pages (699) and most manuscripts (68) in a single monthly issue. The July issue increased the record to 703 pages of research. The September 2012 issue holds the current monthly records of 726 pages and 75 manuscripts. On an annual basis for 2012, records were exceeded with a total of 7,466 pages for 740 published manuscripts. In total, 1,227 submissions were received during 2012.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1450.083

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicCassava research and cyanideFrench-language works237,207