MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069031798 · doi:10.1109/isspa.2012.6310542

Multi scale classification approach for coronary artery detection from X-ray angiography

2012· article· en· W2069031798 on OpenAlexaff
Mathieu Plourde, Luc Duong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHessian matrixRobustness (evolution)False positive paradoxAngiographyArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceFeature extractionCoronary arteriesRadiologySupport vector machinePattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionArteryMedicineMathematicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

X-ray angiography is currently the gold standard for navigation guidance during percutaneous coronary interventions. From X-ray angiography, robust automatic detection of coronary arteries would be of great interest during cardiac interventions. Multi scale Hessian-based filtering was proven successful to automatically detect vessels from X-ray angiography. However, other anatomical structures interfere greatly with the detection process and the result still contains many false positives. The goal of the project is to propose a novel machine learning-based method to improve Hessian-based coronary artery detection from X-ray angiography. The proposed method divides Hessian-filtered images in patches, uses feature extraction with a contour profiling algorithm, and classifies using Support Vector Machines. The method is applied recursively on the detected connected components using patches of different sizes to define the arteries. This scheme allows an improvement of robustness against noise and imaging artifacts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207