MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069033645 · doi:10.1097/ftd.0b013e318299fa38

Multiple Regression Analysis of Factors Predicting Mycophenolic Acid Free Fraction in 91 Adult Organ Transplant Recipients

2013· review· en· W2069033645 on OpenAlexafffund
Tony K. L. Kiang, Karen Ng, Mary H. H. Ensom

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Drug Monitoring · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British ColumbiaChild and Family Research Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineCreatinineLinear regressionAlbuminInternal medicineSpearman's rank correlation coefficientUrologyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an antirejection drug used in various types of solid organ transplants. MPA is extensively bound to albumin, and free MPA is thought to be the primary immunosuppressive agent. Little is known of what contributes to the wide interindividual variability in the observed MPA free fraction (MPAf) in humans. The purpose of this study was to determine, using multiple regression analysis of demographic and laboratory variables that are routinely collected during clinic visits, patient factors that predict MPAf in a large sample (n = 91) of organ transplant recipients. METHODS: Age, weight, height, total daily MPA dose, albumin, serum creatinine (SrCr), and MPAf were obtained from islet (n = 16), kidney (n = 28), and heart/lung (n = 47) transplant recipients. Multiple linear regression analysis and the The Spearman rank correlation were conducted using SigmaStat (version 3.5 for Windows). Significance was set a priori at P = 0.05. RESULTS: The pooled data can be described as (mean ± SD) follows: age (52 ± 13 years), weight (72 ± 15 kg), height (169 ± 9 cm), total daily MPA dose (1632 ± 667 mg), albumin (42 ± 7 g/L), SrCr (112 ± 34 µmol/L), and MPAf (2.9% ± 3.5%). Multiple regression of all commonly acquired variables generated the following equation: MPAf = 1.865 + (0.0357 × age (yrs)) + (0.0125 × weight (kg)) - (0.0202 × height (cm)) - (0.000323 × total daily dose (mg)) + (0.0122 × albumin (g/L)) + (0.0160 × SrCr (µmol/L)) (r = 0.06), but none of the variables were significant predictors of MPAf (P > 0.05). The Spearman rank correlation of each individual variable confirmed lack of significant correlation with MPAf. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study attempting to describe factors predicting MPAf in adult organ transplant recipients involving a large sample size. The novel findings of lack of significant predictors warrant further investigations using additional patient factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Drug MonitoringSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207