Correlation of the Transport Properties for the Ethanol-Water System Using Neural Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Process design and simulation rely heavily on the accuracy and availability of transport property correlations. General models that combine the properties of pure components often lack the necessary accuracy. In this investigation, neural networks were used to model some important transport properties for the ethanol-water binary system. Specifically, a three-layer feed-forward neural network with six neurons in the hidden layer was used to model viscosity, thermal conductivity, surface tension and the Fick diffusion coefficient based on an array of experimental data. These neural network models were then compared to some conventional models that are commonly used to predict the aforementioned transport properties. The results showed that the neural network models were able to represent the experimental data very well for the system studied. One advantage in using neural network models to represent these properties is their ability to predict complex and interrelated behaviors without a priori information about the underlying model structure. Further, since all the models retain the same simple matrix structure, their integration into computer codes becomes straightforward and non-repetitive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it