<i>Pasteurella multocida</i> septic shock following liver transplantation treated with drotrecogin alfa (activated)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Severe sepsis and progression to septic shock in solid organ transplant recipients is associated with a high mortality. We describe a fulminant case of septic shock in a liver transplant recipient caused by Pasteurella multocida, a gram-negative coccobacillus most commonly associated with domestic cats and dogs. P. multocida is a rare cause of bacteremia and has not been reported as a cause of septic shock following liver transplantation. In addition to standard therapy, the patient was managed with drotrecogin alpha (activated) recombinant activated protein C (APC), an evidence-based agent that has been shown to significantly improve outcome in severe sepsis in the non-transplant population. The known risk factors, clinical course, and outcomes of severe infection associated with P. multocida are also briefly reviewed. This case illustrates the need for transplant recipients and their healthcare providers to carefully consider the risk of severe infection associated with domestic animal exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".