MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069068162 · doi:10.1260/0957-4565.41.10.76

A Fault Diagnosis Approach for Gears Using Multidimensional Features and Intelligent Classifier

2010· article· en· W2069068162 on OpenAlexaff
Zhixiong Li, Xinping Yan, Chengqing Yuan, Jiangbin Zhao, Zhongxiao Peng

Bibliographic record

VenueNoise & Vibration Worldwide · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Transportation of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature vectorPattern recognition (psychology)Hilbert–Huang transformEngineeringVibrationAutoregressive modelArtificial intelligenceWavelet packet decompositionArtificial neural networkComputer scienceFault (geology)Probabilistic neural networkClassifier (UML)Dimensionality reductionFeature extractionWaveletWavelet transformComputer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gear mechanisms are an important element in a variety of industrial applications and about 80% of the breakdowns of the transmission machinery are caused by the gear failure. Efficient incipient fault detection and accurate fault diagnosis are therefore critical to machinery normal operation. A new hybrid intelligent diagnosis method is proposed in this work to identify multiple categories of gear defection. In this method, wavelet packet transform (WPT), empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and Wigner-Ville distributions (WVD), combined with autoregressive (AR) model algorithm, were performed on gear vibration signals to extract useful fault characteristic information. Then, multidimensional feature sets including energy distribution, statistical features and AR parameters were obtained to represent gear operation conditions from different perspectives. The nonlinear dimensionality reduction algorithm, i.e. isometric mapping (Isomap), was employed in statistics to mine the intrinsic structure of the feature space in a low-dimensional space, and thus to speed up the training of the probabilistic neural network (PNN) classifier and enhance its diagnosis accuracy. Experiments with different gear faults were conducted, and the vibration signals were measured under different drive speeds and loads. The analysis results indicate that the proposed method is feasible and effective in the gear multi-fault diagnosis, and the isolation of different gear conditions, including normal, single crack, compound fault of wear and spalling, etc., has been accomplished. Since the recognition results are available directly from the output of PNN, the proposed diagnosis technique provides the possibility to fulfill the automatic recognition on gear multiple faults

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNoise & Vibration WorldwideSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207