Processing of the insulin-like growth factor-IImannose 6-phosphate receptor in isolated liver subcellular fractions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A truncated, soluble form of the insulin-like growth factor-II-mannose 6-phosphate (IGF-II-M6P) receptor has been identified in serum and shown to be released from cultured tissues and cells, liver being the main contributor to serum receptor in adult rats. In the present study, the processing of the IGF-II-M6P receptor has been characterized in isolated liver subcellular fractions using ligand binding, affinity crosslinking, and Western immunoblotting techniques. The receptor in plasma membrane fractions differed from that in Golgi-endosomal fractions by: (i) a lower molecular size upon reducing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (245 vs. 255 kDa); (ii) a less tight membrane association as judged upon extractibility by NaCI; and (iii) the inability to recognize antibody anti-22C, directed against the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor. Incubation of cell fractions at 30 degrees C led to a pH- and time-dependent release of the receptor into the medium. The pH optimum for release was 5.5 in the Golgi-endosomal fraction and 7.5 in plasma membrane fractions; at this pH, approximately 2% and 20%-30% of total receptors were released per hour, respectively. Receptor release was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by aprotinin, benzamidine, and leupeptin in the Golgi-endosomal fraction, and by 1,10 phenanthroline in plasma membrane fractions, although high concentrations were required for inhibition. The receptor released from Golgi-endosomes showed a 5-10 kDa reduction in size and a loss of ability to recognize antibody anti-22C, but that released from plasma membranes showed little or no changes in size. We conclude that soluble, carboxy-terminally truncated forms of the IGF-II-M6P receptor are generated from the intact receptor in isolated Golgi-endosomal and plasma membrane fractions. However, receptor processing in these fractions exhibits different properties, suggesting the involvement of different proteases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".