MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069070665 · doi:10.1109/tie.2012.2219837

Digital Predictive Current Control of a Three-Phase Four-Leg Inverter

2012· article· en· W2069070665 on OpenAlexaff
Marco Rivera, Venkata Yaramasu, Ana M. Llor, José Rodríguez, Bin Wu, Maurice Fadel

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDSPACETotal harmonic distortionControl theory (sociology)Space vector modulationInverterDigital controlThree-phaseComputer scienceController (irrigation)HarmonicModel predictive controlPulse-width modulationCurrent (fluid)Modulation (music)Electronic engineeringEngineeringControl (management)VoltageAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While the classical control techniques for three-phase two-level four-leg inverters are based on pulsewidth modulation or 3-D space vector modulation, this paper presents a simple digital current control strategy without the modulation stage. The proposed controller uses the discrete nature of the four-leg inverter and filter to generate the switching states. Using a predictive cost function, the optimal switching state to be applied in the next sampling interval is selected. The proposed controller offers excellent reference tracking with less current harmonic distortion for balanced and unbalanced loading conditions. The feasibility of the proposed strategy is verified by digital implementation on a dSPACE DS1104-based rapid prototype platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations171
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207