Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Olfaction is a sense that has close relationships with the limbic system and emotion. Empathy is a vicarious feeling of others' emotional states. The two functions are known to be subserved by common neuroanatomical structures, including orbitofrontal cortex, mediodorsal thalamus, and the amygdala. This study demonstrates a correlation between smell identification and empathy, using the Mehrabian and Epstein Empathy Questionnaire and Alberta Smell Test. Right nostril smell identification correlated with empathy, whereas the left nostril did not. Given the predominantly ipsilateral representation in the olfactory system, this is in accordance with right hemisphere dominance for emotional functions and empathy. Further, the emotional component of empathy (feeling another's emotions) correlated with smell, whereas a cognitive component (comprehending another's emotions) did not. This study is the first to demonstrate a relationship between empathy and smell in normal subjects, suggesting common neural substrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it