Characterization of Human Adipose Tissue Derived Hematopoietic Stem Cell, Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Side Population Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adipose tissue represents an abundant and accessible source of multipotent adult stem cells, which appear to possess ayet-undetermined degree of plasticity. Subcutaneous adipose tissue is much studied in recent years than omentum fattissue. Hence the objective of this work is to characterize the freshly isolated human adipose tissue derived stromalvascular fraction cell relative to passage 0 from subcutaneous fat and the omentum fat. The stromal vascular fraction ofboth subcutaneous and omentum fat contains hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cell population where as in P0 themesenchymal stem cell alone was retained. The side population ABCG2 is present in subcutaneous fat, whereas noABCG2 expression is found in omentum fat. This study showed that the omentum fat exhibit higher percentage ofhematopoietic cells compared to subcutaneous fat in both SVF and P0. It is concluded from this study that not onlysubcutaneous fat, but also omentum fat derived stem cells serve as a therapeutic potential in Regenerative medicine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".