MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069114164 · doi:10.4000/criticon.371

Unidad sin orden: milagros, rituales y caos en el Potosí barroco

2013· article· es· W2069114164 on OpenAlex
Juan Luis Suárez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCriticón · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este artículo se discuten tres hilos de la narrativa de Bartolomé de Arzáns en su Historia de la Villa Imperial de Potosí: la riqueza minera de la ciudad, las desgracias naturales y la negociación frente a estas entre ser humano y divinidad. Arzáns opta por una interpretación religiosa de los sucesos en Potosí, es decir, en función de los pecados de sus habitantes y la intervención de Dios. Las diferencias étnicas y de poder presentados en la historia de doscientos años que cubre Arzáns son el motor de gran parte de las tragedias y conflictos constantes de la ciudad, los cuales, junto con los milagros que los reparan, se vuelven los hitos de la historia del Potosí. Este vaivén entre desgracia y milagro tuvo un efecto en el paisaje de la ciudad y en las prácticas de poder teatralizadas en fiestas y ceremonias —formas de negociación que enlazan las ideas de Giorgio Agamben sobre la liturgia como la verdadera política cristiana con los conceptos de orden y oikonomia de san Agustín.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it