EMI Risk Assessment in a Hospital Ward With One and Two Roaming Wireless Transmitters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To control electromagnetic interference, hospitals often specify that mobile transmitters may not be brought any closer than a minimum separation distance (MSD) to an electronic medical device. This paper investigates the risk that the field strength due to mobile transmitters exceeds the immunity level of a medical device. The spatial variation of the field strength can be characterized by the well-known Ricean probability distribution, using the Sabine method to evaluate the parameters. The mobility of transmitters is accounted for by assuming a function for the probability that a transmitter is present at each location throughout the hospital room. The risk of exceeding immunity is estimated with no restriction on the movement of mobile transmitters, and the reduction in risk is estimated when an MSD policy is enforced. Staff may not fully comply with the MSD, so the increase in risk with specified levels of non-compliance is found. It is shown that with some non-compliance the risk of exceeding immunity becomes constant with increasing MSD, and so specifying a larger MSD does not necessarily increase safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it