MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069168350 · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1072369

Congenital Cervical Teratoma in Neonates Case Report and Review

2000· review· en· W2069168350 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Pediatric Surgery · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTeratomas and Epidermoid Cysts
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTeratomaIn uteroSurgeryAirway obstructionAirwaySurgical resectionMetastasisPregnancyFetusCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cervical teratomas are uncommon neoplasms. Although these lesions are histologically benign they are usually large and may cause airway obstruction. Cervical teratomas are usually diagnosed at birth. In-utero diagnosis is possible by prenatal ultrasound which assists in planning early airway management and surgical intervention. Mortality is significant but prognosis is good with airway control and complete surgical excision. However, pressure injury of contiguous structures can limit resectability and adversely affect outcome. Malignant cervical teratoma with metastasis has been reported mostly arising in adults with poor outcome. We present nine cases of neonatal cervical teratoma identified at two institutions between 1984 and 1996. One patient died before surgical intervention. All others underwent resection. There was one intraoperative death and one postoperative death. The remaining six patients did well postoperatively with no significant sequelae with 3 to 14 years follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it