Starch source and content in postpartum dairy cow diets: Effects on plasma metabolites and reproductive processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the effects of dietary starch source and content in the immediate postpartum period on plasma metabolites and hormones and ovarian follicular development. One of 3 diets was fed in a randomized block design to 40 cows from calving until 70 d in milk. The diets contained 45% alfalfa silage (AS), 45% barley silage (BS), or 41% barley silage and 4% supplemental starch (SS) on a dry matter basis. All diets contained 45% barley-based concentrate and 10% alfalfa hay. Resulting starch levels were 25.2, 23.3, and 26.7% for AS, BS, and SS, respectively. Body condition was scored every other week and dry matter intake and milk yield were recorded daily. Milk samples were obtained weekly and blood samples were taken at calving and then every other week to determine concentrations of glucose, insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1, β-hydroxybutyrate, and nonesterified fatty acids. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed twice per week from 7 d after calving until first ovulation or 62 d in milk in all cows. For a subset of 7 AS-, 8 BS-, and 9 SS-fed cows, a complete estrous cycle was monitored for ovarian dynamics, and blood samples were collected every second day for progesterone and estradiol. Luteinizing hormone pulsatility was also determined (5 cows/treatment) approximately 15 d postcalving. Treatment had no effect on body condition score, dry matter intake, blood metabolites, milk yield, or milk fat and protein contents, but BS-fed cows had significantly higher levels of milk urea nitrogen compared with SS cows. Cows fed SS (31 d) tended to have a shorter interval from calving to first ovulation than cows fed AS (43 d) or BS (38 d). The incidence of double first ovulations was higher in cows fed SS (46%) compared with those fed BS (0%). Treatment had no effect on LH pulse frequency or amplitude, ovarian dynamics, or progesterone and estradiol concentrations during the observed estrous cycle. Energy balance did not differ among cows fed the 3 diets. Overall, dietary starch source and concentration had little effect on productivity or metabolic status of postpartum cows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".