Rigorous modeling of UV absorption by TiO<sub>2</sub> films in a photocatalytic reactor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The radiation absorption profiles on the surfaces of TiO 2 films in a corrugated‐plate photocatalytic reactor were modeled based on first principles. A new term, the local‐area‐specific rate of energy absorption (LASREA), was adopted to describe the catalyst surface radiation in heterogeneous photoreactors. The LASREA and the energy absorption efficiency were both quite sensitive to the dimensions of the corrugated plates. Due to the multiple photon reflections between the opposing surfaces, corrugated plates possess a superior capability for recapturing longer wavelength photons that would otherwise be reflected out of some reactor designs. This results in higher energy absorption efficiency and more uniform LASREA on the catalyst films. Compared to a flat plate, corrugations are predicted to enhance the energy absorption efficiency by up to 50% for UV‐A fluorescent‐lamp‐powered systems and more than 100% for solar‐powered systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".