MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069223940 · doi:10.1239/jap/996986760

On the convergence and limits of certain matrix sequences arising in quasi-birth-and-death Markov chains

2001· article· en· W2069223940 on OpenAlexaff
Qi‐Ming He, Marcel F. Neuts

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Probability · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMarkov chainSequence (biology)Matrix (chemical analysis)Limit (mathematics)Convergence (economics)Stochastic matrixApplied mathematicsBoundary (topology)Limit of a sequenceBirth–death processRate of convergenceMarkov processMathematical analysisStatisticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the convergence of certain matrix sequences that arise in quasi-birth-and-death (QBD) Markov chains and we identify their limits. In particular, we focus on a sequence of matrices whose elements are absorption probabilities into some boundary states of the QBD. We prove that, under certain technical conditions, that sequence converges. Its limit is either the minimal nonnegative solution G of the standard nonlinear matrix equation, or it is a stochastic solution that can be explicitly expressed in terms of G. Similar results are obtained relative to the standard matrix R that arises in the matrix-geometric solution of the QBD. We present numerical examples that clarify some of the technical issues of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied ProbabilitySame topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207