Un dilemme de sexualité/sécurité : la logique identitaire américaine face à la menace épidémique en Afrique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Initié avec l’Administration Clinton, le sida a peu à peu été abordé dans son traitement, à la fois comme une question de santé publique et comme un « nouveau » problème sécuritaire auquel les Etats-Unis doivent maintenant faire face. Cette transformation discursive contient plusieurs implications qu’il faut aborder. En adoptant l’optique du féminisme postmoderne, cet article cherche à analyser comment les représentations discursives américaines de la pandémie du sida en Afrique visent à protéger une certaine conception de l’identité masculine de l’Etat et des structures du pouvoir. Une attention particulière est prêtée aux liens qui s’établissent entre le corps politique et le corps physique dans les discours touchant au sida, et aux implications sur le plan du genre de la loi de 2003 intitulée « United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Act » adoptée par l’Administration de George W. Bush.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".