MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069292723 · doi:10.1149/05031.0251ecst

In Situ Spectroscopic Ellipsometry and Electrochemical Studies of the Barrier Layer on Iron in Borate Buffer Solutions

2013· article· en· W2069292723 on OpenAlexaff
Zijie Lu, Samin Sharifi‐Asl, Digby D. Macdonald

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsFord Motor Company (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEllipsometryX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyElectrochemistryLayer (electronics)Barrier layerMaterials scienceBuffer solutionInorganic chemistryOxideChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Schottky barrierChemical engineeringThin filmElectrodeNanotechnologyPhysical chemistryChromatographyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growth and properties of the passive films on iron in EDTA (ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid, disodium salt)-containing borate buffer solution of pH = 8.15 were investigated using in-situ Spectroscopic Ellipsometry (SE), Mott-Schottky analysis, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). EDTA effectively suppressed the formation of the outer layer of the passive film, thereby rendering the barrier layer amenable to direct examination. It was shown that the barrier layer growth was completed in about 10 s upon stepping the potential in the anodic direction. Contrariwise, thinning of the barrier oxide layer upon stepping the potential in the cathodic direction occurred at a rate that was two orders in magnitude lower than the growth rate. The information obtained above was interpreted in terms of the Point Defect Model (PDM) containing both oxygen vacancies and cation interstitials, with the latter being the dominant defect in the barrier layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207