In Situ Spectroscopic Ellipsometry and Electrochemical Studies of the Barrier Layer on Iron in Borate Buffer Solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growth and properties of the passive films on iron in EDTA (ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid, disodium salt)-containing borate buffer solution of pH = 8.15 were investigated using in-situ Spectroscopic Ellipsometry (SE), Mott-Schottky analysis, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). EDTA effectively suppressed the formation of the outer layer of the passive film, thereby rendering the barrier layer amenable to direct examination. It was shown that the barrier layer growth was completed in about 10 s upon stepping the potential in the anodic direction. Contrariwise, thinning of the barrier oxide layer upon stepping the potential in the cathodic direction occurred at a rate that was two orders in magnitude lower than the growth rate. The information obtained above was interpreted in terms of the Point Defect Model (PDM) containing both oxygen vacancies and cation interstitials, with the latter being the dominant defect in the barrier layer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".