MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069321374 · doi:10.1364/ao.46.000495

Optical characterization of porous silicon and crystalline silicon by the Kramers-Kronig method

2007· article· en· W2069321374 on OpenAlexaff
Abdollah Mortezaali, R.S. Dariani, Saeideh Asghari, Z. Bayindir

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Optics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorous siliconMaterials scienceRefractive indexOpticsSiliconCrystalline siliconKramers–Kronig relationsAbsorption (acoustics)Attenuation coefficientSpectral lineMolar absorptivityScatteringLight scatteringSpectrometerPhoton energyOptoelectronicsPhotonPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electronic structure of porous silicon (PS) has been characterized by optical reflectance spectra analyses. Using a Cary-500 spectrometer, the reflectance spectra of PS are measured in the photon energy range of 0.4-6 eV. The spectral responses of optical constants are calculated for PS and Si by Kramers-Kronig analysis. The analysis clarified strong evidence for widening and direct bandgaps for PS samples. Also, the optical constants of PS layers as a function of porosity have been studied. Our results indicate that PS retains some of the characteristic optical features of crystalline Si. However, in the visible region, PS shows that the imaginary part of the complex refractive index increases, and the real part decreases as porosity increases. This feature could be related to the surface roughness of PS and its role in surface absorption and scattering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied OpticsSame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207