MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069321858 · doi:10.3769/radioisotopes.49.339

Improvement of Labeling Efficiency of Glycoprotein-Liposome Conjugates with Iodine-125 by Using Bolton-Hunter Reagent and Their Distribution in Mice

2000· article· en· W2069321858 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRADIOISOTOPES · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiotin and Related Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReagentConjugateIodineGlycoproteinDistribution (mathematics)LiposomeChemistryChromatographyMedicinePharmacologyInternal medicineBiochemistryOrganic chemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

著者らはすでに, 機能性複合糖質の代表格である細胞膜面上の糖蛋白質の糖鎖機能を模倣した新規なドラッグデリバリーシステムの開発を目指して, 蛋白質を介したリポソームへの糖鎖の導入方法を検討し, リポソーム膜面上に結合した糖蛋白質の糖鎖構造改変とレクチン結合活性ならびに体内動態特性との関連について明らかにしてきた。これまでの体内動態実験では, 125I標識複合体を用いてきたが, 通常, 糖蛋白質の125I標識率はきわめて低いため, その125I標識率を高めるための工夫が必要となってきた。そこで, 本研究ではBolton-Hunter試薬 (以下, BHRと略す) を用いて, 標識率の改善を試みるとともに, レクチン結合活性および生体内動態への影響について検討した。一般的には先にBHRを125I標識し, 125I-BHRを蛋白質に導入する方法をとるが, 今回は先にリポソーム中のアミノ基にBHRを反応させ, p-ヒドロキシフェニルプロピル基を導入した後にクロラミンT法による125I標識を行う方法をとった。結果として, BHR処理により複合体の125I標識率は顕著に上昇した。また, BHR処理による複合体のレクチン結合活性への影響は見られなかった。しかしながら, 生体内動態は両者で顕著な差が見られた。すなわち, 肝臓への取込みが高まり, その結果腎臓への排泄が速められた。以上の結果より, 糖蛋白質結合リポソームの放射性ヨード標識には, 新たなる方法を開発する必要があろう。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it