Recent advances in airborne survey technology yield performance approaching ground-based surveys
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Airborne magnetic and electromagnetic systems have been very effective over the years for mineral prospecting and in support of petroleum exploration. More recently, these towed-bird systems, operating at sensor altitudes of 30–50 m, have supported environmental investigations. The towed-bird systems can provide regional data for site investigations, such as locating or delimiting the boundaries of waste areas, identifying geologic contacts that influence environmental issues, or mapping saline intrusion. However, these conventional systems cannot provide the resolution required in many environmental and engineering problems because the distance between sensors and target objects is too great. Ground-based surveys are often suitable for addressing these problems but, for many sites, the area can be too large to be expediently addressed with surface geophysics. Contamination of government land with unexploded ordnance (UXO) is one such large-scale problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it