Study of pressure fluctuations in an internal loop airlift bioreactor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The origin and coupling of pressure fluctuations in an internal loop airlift bioreactor are investigated. The pressure fluctuations in the reactor are divided into two categories: global pressure fluctuations and local pressure fluctuations. It is found that the coupling between global pressure fluctuations and local pressure fluctuations mainly focuses in the frequency region between 10 and 30 Hz. Local pressure fluctuations in the reactor are strongly affected by pressure waves originating from the air‐supply system, while pressure fluctuations caused by the bubble eruption at the liquid surface have less influence on local pressure fluctuations. Based on the coherence analysis, the pressure signal at a certain position in the reactor is decomposed into three different parts: coherent part, joint incoherent part and exclusive incoherent part. The energy ratios of these different parts are helpful to study the interaction among pressure fluctuations from different sources. Three flow regimes were identified from the evolution of the energy ratio of the joint incoherent part. © 2011 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".