A Study on Regression of Hypercholesterolemic Atherosclerosis in Rabbits by Flax Lignan Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flax lignan complex (FLC) isolated from flaxseed suppresses the development of hypercholesterolemic atherosclerosis. The objectives of this study were to investigate if FLC produces regression of atherosclerosis and if regression is associated with reductions in serum lipids and oxidative stress. The studies were conducted in 4 groups of rabbits: group I, control diet (2 months); group II, 0.25% cholesterol diet (2 months); group III, 0.25% cholesterol diet (2 months) followed by regular diet (4 months); and group IV, 0.25% cholesterol diet (2 months) followed by regular diet and FLC (4 months). Serum lipids and oxidative stress parameters were measured before and at various intervals thereafter on their respective diets. The aortas were removed at the end of the protocol for assessment of atherosclerotic plaques and oxidative parameters. Atherosclerosis in group II was associated with hyperlipidemia and increased oxidative stress. Atherosclerotic changes were accelerated in group III, and this was associated with reductions in serum lipids and oxidative stress. Atherosclerotic lesions in group IV were similar to group II, but significantly smaller than those in group III, and were associated with reductions in serum lipids and oxidative stress similar to that in group III. These results indicate that FLC does not produce regression but prevents the acceleration of atherosclerosis due to the removal of cholesterol in the diet. These effects of FLC are not associated with reductions in serum lipids and oxidative stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".