The energetic implications of uncoupling protein-3 in skeletal muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite almost a decade of research since the identification of uncoupling protein-3 (UCP3), the molecular mechanisms and physiological functions of this mitochondrial anion carrier protein are not well understood. Because of its highly selective expression in skeletal muscle and the existence of mitochondrial proton leak in this tissue, early reports proposed that UCP3 caused a basal proton leak and increased thermogenesis. However, gene expression data and results from knockout and overexpression studies indicated that UCP3 does not cause basal proton leak or physiological thermogenesis. UCP3 expression is associated with increases in circulating fatty acids and in fatty acid oxidation (FAO) in muscle. Fatty acids are also well recognized as activators of the prototypic UCP1 in brown adipose tissue. This has led to hypotheses implicating UCP3 in mitochondrial fatty acid translocation. The corresponding hypothesized physiological roles include facilitated FAO and protection from the lipotoxic effects of fatty acids. Recent in vitro studies of physiological increases in UCP3 in muscle cells demonstrate increased FAO, and decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Detailed mechanistic studies indicate that ROS or lipid by-products of ROS can activate a UCP3-mediated proton leak, which in turn acts in a negative feedback loop to mitigate ROS production. Altogether, UCP3 appears to play roles in muscle FAO and mitigated ROS production. Future studies will need to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying increased FAO, as well as the physiological relevance of ROS-activated proton leak.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".