MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069356556 · doi:10.2118/150315-ms

Optimal Application Conditions for Heavy-Oil/Bitumen Recovery by Solvent Injection at Elevated Temperatures

2011· article· en· W2069356556 on OpenAlex
Hector Leyva-Gomez, Tayfun Babadagli

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAsphalteneSolventAsphaltPetroleum engineeringEnhanced oil recoverySteam injectionWater injection (oil production)Oil sandsMaterials sciencePropaneLight crude oilEnvironmental scienceChemical engineeringChemistryGeologyOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Steam injection is the most common technique in heavy oil/bitumen recovery. However, the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, its water requirements and excessive operational cost and problems entail finding alternative solutions. One approach is combining steam and solvent injection by taking advantage of steam injection preheating the reservoir for more effective solvent recovery application. In this case, the performance of subsequent solvent injection strictly depends on the temperature and pressure in the reservoir. Recent experimental studies on superheated solvent injection showed that solvent in the gas formed near the saturation line yields an optimal recovery minimizing the asphaltene precipitation and maximizing the recovery. This paper investigates this process through a numerical modeling exercise and formulates the optimal pressure and temperature conditions for different reservoir conditions and hydrocarbon solvents. We first report the results of numerical simulation of laboratory experiments, in which heavy oil was exposed to solvent vapour at high temperatures. To achieve these results, a radial 3D numerical model of 15x1x63 cells was constructed using a commercial numeric simulator. The injection of either propane or butane into sand packs or consolidated sandstones at elevated temperatures was simulated. A pressure-temperature sensitivity analysis was carried out for different core sizes to understand the dynamics of the gravity drainage process associated with asphaltene precipitation. Asphaltene pore plugging behaviour was modeled and diffusion of solvent into the heavy oil was analyzed to determine both ideal solvent type and optimal operating conditions for solvent injection at high temperatures. Our preliminary results and observations showed that the solvent should be in the gas phase and its sensitivity to temperature and sample height (for effective gravity drainage) is more critical than the pressure. There also exists a critical temperature that yields amaximum recovery and this value was determined for the rock/reservoir types and solvents considered in this study. Solvents considered, i.e., propane and butane, behaved differently in terms of asphaltene precipitation and its effects on ultimate recovery. The history matching to the experimental data was achieved primarily by considering this effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it