MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069362608 · doi:10.1080/14789940500097840

The needs of males detained under the legal category of ‘psychopathic disorder’ in high security: Implications for policy and service development

2005· article· en· W2069362608 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Dolan, Stuart Thomas, Samantha Thomas, Graham Thornicroft

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPsychiatryMental healthPopulationLegislatureQuarter (Canadian coin)Service (business)MedicinePolitical scienceLawEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Approximately a quarter of the high secure psychiatric hospital (HSPH) population is detained under the 1983 Mental Health Act legal category of ‘psychopathic disorder’ (PD). To date, there have been no studies specifically examining the security, treatment, and placement needs of this group despite recent policy developments. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of the needs of all males detained under the legal category of PD in the HSPHs in England. We found that 60% continued to require high secure care. Ongoing needs primarily related to substance misuse, interpersonal relationships, and sexual offending. Security and political issues were key factors associated with the continued need for HSPH care. High levels of Axis I and II co-morbidity were found. Although a substantial proportion did not require HSPH care, organisational and service-related factors prevented or delayed their transfer to appropriate services. The findings are discussed in light of proposed legislative reforms and service developments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Forensic Psychiatry and PsychologySame topicPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingFrench-language works237,207