MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069366310 · doi:10.1176/pn.40.1.00400008

Pharmacists Often Uneasy With Psychiatric Patients

2005· article· en· W2069366310 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychiatryPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Professional NewsFull AccessPharmacists Often Uneasy With Psychiatric PatientsAaron LevinAaron LevinPublished Online:7 Jan 2005https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.40.1.00400008Pharmacists have positive attitudes toward patients who fill prescriptions for psychiatric medications but still feel so awkward talking to them that they provide less counseling about symptoms and side effects than to patients with medical diagnoses, says a new Canadian study."Pharmacists said they monitored patients with mental illness less frequently than patients with cardiovascular problems," wrote Beth Sproule, Pharm.D., B.Sc.Phm., an assistant professor in the departments of pharmacy and psychiatry at the University of Toronto. "Apprehension or discomfort during patient interactions may lead to ineffective counseling or the lack of essential medical services."A new direction in pharmacy practice calls for providing" pharmaceutical care" to patients in order to identify and prevent drug-related problems, said Sproule.Better mental health training and increased privacy while counseling might improve the professional interactions between community pharmacists and patients using psychiatric medications, wrote Sproule in the December Psychiatric Services. She and two colleagues, Vinay Phokeo, M.Sc., B.Sc.Phm., and Lalitha Raman-Wilms, Pharm.D., B.Sc.Phm., surveyed 800 pharmacists in the Toronto area regarding their attitudes toward patients with psychiatric diagnoses, and 283 responded. For comparison, they asked similar questions about patients taking cardiovascular drugs.They found that 36 percent of the pharmacists felt awkward asking patients why they were taking psychiatric medications. Only 7 percent reacted the same way to patients taking cardiovascular medications. While 93 percent felt comfortable discussing cardiovascular symptoms, only 71 percent had similar reactions to psychiatric symptoms. When asked if patients with mental health problems did not want to talk to pharmacists, they agreed or were neutral almost half of the time (47 percent), compared with 6 percent who gave that response to a question about cardiac symptoms.That persons working in the heath professions have difficulty talking to patients with mental illness comes as no surprise to some."I don't know why pharmacists would be doing any better than the rest of us," said Boston psychiatrist Ken Duckworth, M.D., medical director for the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI). "Stigma is alive and well, and pharmacists are not different from other health professionals.""In many disease states, there are always invisible barriers," agreed Stephen Setter, Pharm.D., an assistant professor of pharmacy at Washington State University in Spokane. "With patients with bipolar disease, dementia, or depression, you have to look beyond the barriers."Yet stigma or lack of training aren't the only barriers, said Setter, a spokesperson for the American Pharmacists Association.The patients are not getting adequate information from the prescribing physicians, said Sproule. "Only 8 percent of pharmacists agreed that patients who use psychiatric medications receive all the necessary drug information from their physician or psychiatrist."Lack of compensation often impedes patient counseling too. Some insurance companies now pay pharmacists to counsel patients with diabetes, but the model is still not widely adopted."You go to a therapist, you pay, and you get individual attention," said Setter. "For a pharmacist, there's usually no compensation aside from payment for the prescription."A little more education for pharmacists might help as well, added Sproule. Only 24 percent said they had learned enough about mental health during their pharmacy training to help them do their job, compared with 61 percent who claimed an adequate background in cardiovascular issues. When asked about barriers to counseling mental health patients, the pharmacists said they lacked time; information on patient diagnosis, drug indications, or treatment goals; and private counseling areas in the pharmacy. Patient symptoms like hostility, inattentiveness, or irritability created communication difficulties, they said.Pharmacists could improve their ability to understand and counsel psychiatric patients if undergraduate and continuing education programs included better mental health curricula, said Sproule.Some pharmacy schools already expose their students to psychiatric patients, noted Setter. Pharmacy education at Washington State now includes a strong psychiatric component, he said. Students first observe interactions with persons simulating depression or Parkinson's disease. Then real patients come in to present and to answer students' questions about their conditions and about which drugs worked and which did not."Students learn that not everyone who comes into the pharmacy is happy and healthy," said Setter. "We're all human, and we all need empathy."Some students also take rotations through local psychiatric hospitals. When Setter did such a rotation as a student, he was initially frightened to walk into a psychiatric ward."But after six weeks, I felt they were just like other people," he said. "Not all our students get this chance, but we must find ways to increase their contact with persons with psychiatric diagnoses."Part of his work now involves team home visits to geriatric patients. He is impressed by how little patients know about the conditions and medications and the number of questions they ask, even after years of treatment.Most patients may not need or want the additional counseling a pharmacist can provide, said Setter, but for those who do, the time spent can improve their understanding of their illness and its treatment, make them aware of drug interactions and side effects, increase compliance, and improve the outcome of drug therapy.The study was supported by the Association of Faculties of Pharmacy of Canada–Apotex Undergraduate Pharmacy Practice Research Award and the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto.The study, "Community Pharmacists' Attitudes Toward and Professional Interactions With Users of Psychiatric Medication," is posted online at<http://ps.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/55/12/1434e?>.▪ Psychiatr Serv 2004 55 1434 ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it