Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric Ring Opening Reactions of Oxabicyclic Alkenes: Application of Halide Effects in the Development of a General Process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have demonstrated halide effects in the rhodium-catalyzed asymmetric ring opening reaction of oxabicyclic alkenes. By employing halide and protic additives, the catalyst poisoning effect of aliphatic amines is reversed allowing the amount nucleophile to react in high yield and ee. Second, by simply changing the halide ligand on the rhodium catalyst from chloride to iodide, the reactivity and enantioselectivity of reactions employing an aromatic amine, malonate or carboxylate nucleophile are dramatically improved. Third, through the application of halide effects and more forcing reaction conditions, less reactive oxabicycle [2.2.1] substrates react to generate synthetically useful enantioenriched cyclohexenol products. Application of these new conditions to the more reactive oxabenzonorbornadiene permits the reaction to be run with very low catalyst loadings (0.01 mol %).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".