Effects of sedimenting particles on the turbulence structure in a horizontal channel flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work presents the results of experiments conducted in a horizontal channel to characterize low Reynolds number turbulent flows in the presence of small solid particles. The particle diameter relative to the integral length scale, dp/Λx, is approximately 0.02. Particles and fluid turbulence characteristics are measured for three average solid volume fractions of approximately ϕv = 2.0 × 10−4, 4.0 × 10−4, and 8.0 × 10−4 under conditions where the particle number density is evolving due to deposition. The results indicate that the mean slip between particles and the fluid is important only close to the wall. Away from the wall, the particles and unladen fluid mean velocities are similar. Differences between particles and the unladen fluid statistics are more pronounced in the wall-normal velocity fluctuations than the streamwise velocity fluctuations and Reynolds shear stress due to the stronger effect of the gravitational force in the wall-normal direction. The fluid turbulent intensities show no dependency on loading, but the peak Reynolds shear stress is significantly reduced. A quadrant decomposition of the Reynolds shear stress revealed a corresponding reduction in the ejections and sweeps for the laden flow in comparison with the unladen flow. Swirling strength and vorticity root-mean-square fluctuations decayed due to the damping effect of particles. The influence of particles on the turbulence structure was examined using two-point correlations of the velocity fluctuations and swirling strength, where it was demonstrated that the wall structures are attached eddies which are more extensive (much larger) in the particle-laden flow compared to the unladen flow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".