Carboxyl-terminal Proteolytic Processing of CUX1 by a Caspase Enables Transcriptional Activation in Proliferating Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proteolytic processing at the end of the G(1) phase generates a CUX1 isoform, p110, which functions either as a transcriptional activator or repressor and can accelerate entry into S phase. Here we describe a second proteolytic event that generates an isoform lacking two active repression domains in the COOH terminus. This processing event was inhibited by treatment of cells with synthetic and natural caspase inhibitors. In vitro, several caspases generated a processed isoform that co-migrated with the in vivo generated product. In cells, recombinant CUX1 proteins in which the region of cleavage was deleted or in which Asp residues were mutated to Ala, were not proteolytically processed. Importantly, this processing event was not associated with apoptosis, as assessed by terminal dUTP nick end labeling assay, cytochrome c localization, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Moreover, processing was observed in S phase but not in early G(1), suggesting that it is regulated through the cell cycle. The functional importance of this processing event was revealed in reporter and cell cycle assays. A recombinant, processed, CUX1 protein was a more potent transcriptional activator of several cell cycle-related genes and was able to accelerate entry into S phase, whereas mutants that could not be processed were inactive in either assay. Conversely, cells treated with the quinoline-Val Asp-2,6-difluorophenoxymethylketone caspase inhibitor proliferated more slowly and exhibited delayed S phase entry following exit from quiescence. Together, our results identify a substrate of caspases in proliferating cells and suggest a mechanism by which caspases can accelerate cell cycle progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".