MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069411014 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m607230200

The Coxsackie and Adenovirus Receptor Binds Microtubules and Plays a Role in Cell Migration

2007· article· en· W2069411014 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick T. Fok, Kuo‐Cheng Huang, Paul C. Holland, Joséphine Nalbantoglu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytoplasmTubulinMicrotubuleCell biologyBiologyImmunoglobulin superfamilyCell adhesion moleculeReceptorChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR), a cell adhesion molecule of the immunoglobulin superfamily, inhibits cell growth of a variety of tumors. The cytoplasmic domain of CAR has been implicated in decreased invasion and intracerebral growth of human U87 glioma cells. Using affinity binding, we identified tubulin as an interaction partner for the cytoplasmic domain of CAR. The interaction was specific; CAR and tubulin co-immunoprecipitated in cells expressing endogenous CAR and partially co-localized in situ. The binding of CAR to tubulin heterodimers and to microtubules was direct, with dissociation constants of approximately 1 mum for tubulin and approximately 32 nm for in vitro assembled microtubules. Whereas CAR-expressing U87 glioma cells had decreased migration in a chemotactic assay in Boyden chambers as compared with control cells, an effect that depended on the presence of the cytoplasmic domain of CAR, the difference was abrogated at low, non-cytotoxic doses of the taxane paclitaxel, a microtubule-stabilizing agent. These results indicate that CAR may affect cell migration through its interaction with microtubules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207