MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069413181 · doi:10.1159/000185606

Spinal Hamartoma with Severe Kyphoscoliosis – A Rare Case of Spinal Mass in a Fetus

2008· article· en· W2069413181 on OpenAlexaff
Danna Loder, Maria Lalous, Louise Rochon, Steffen Albrecht, Lucia Carpineta, Josée Lefebvre, Jennifer Fitzpatrick, Louise Miner, Marc Tischkowitz

Bibliographic record

VenueFetal Diagnosis and Therapy · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversitySt Mary's Hospital CentreMontreal Children's HospitalJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKyphoscoliosisLumbosacral jointSpina bifidaLumbarPrenatal diagnosisDifferential diagnosisHamartomaFetusSpinal cordAnatomySurgeryPathologyScoliosisPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spinal hamartomas are rare lesions consisting of disorganized ecto- and mesodermal tissues of the spinal region. While postnatal identification of spinal hamartomas has been reported, a literature search did not reveal any published reports of prenatal identification of spinal hamartomas. Here we report a 46,XX fetus who presented at 20 weeks' gestation with a lower thoracic and lumbar kyphoscoliosis, suspected spina bifida, and amniotic fluid alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels within the normal range. Interestingly, autopsy at 22 weeks revealed a lumbosacral spinal hamartoma with kyphoscoliosis. We discuss the differential diagnosis for such spinal masses which includes congenital tumors and spinal dysraphism. This case illustrates that spinal hamartomas should be considered as part of the prenatal differential diagnosis of spinal dysraphisms, especially in the presence of normal AFP levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFetal Diagnosis and TherapySame topicSpinal Dysraphism and MalformationsFrench-language works237,207