MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069416053 · doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.498447

Stigma: A negative and a positive influence on help-seeking for adults with acquired hearing loss

2010· article· en· W2069416053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Audiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHearing Impairment and Communication
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalWestern UniversityInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAudiologyHearing lossPsychologyTinnitusMedicineClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are stigmas associated with many chronic health conditions that emerge in adulthood. People who present manifestations of hearing loss are often perceived by others to be cognitively diminished, less able, and socially incompetent. In order to avoid being identified as a member of a stigmatized group, individuals with hearing loss may choose not to seek health services or fail to comply with recommended treatments. The purpose of this study was to better understand how stigma impacted upon the help-seeking activities of adults with an acquired hearing loss. Ten people who had hearing loss, and were members of peer-support groups participated in audio-recorded semi-structured interviews. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using thematic analyses. Analyses revealed that lasting decisions about hearing loss management were made following ‘critical junctures’, when the negative stress found in the respondent's social and physical environment far outweighed positive energy, or when the positive energy found in the respondent's environment far outweighed the negative stress. The time course development of these processes is described.SumarioExisten estigmas asociados con muchas condiciones crónicas de salud que aparecen en la edad adulta. La gente que presenta manifestaciones de pérdida auditiva a menudo son percibidas por los demás como disminuidos cognitivamente, menos capaces, y socialmente incompetentes. Para evitar ser identificado como un miembro de un grupo estigmatizado, los individuos con hipoacusia escogen no buscar ayuda en los servicios de salud o fallan en cumplir con los tratamientos recomendados. El propósito de este estudio fue entender mejor cómo el estigma impacta las actividades de búsqueda de ayuda de adultos con hipoacusias adquiridas. Diez personas con pérdida auditiva, que era miembros de grupos de apoyo a iguales, participaron de entrevistas semi-estructuradas, grabadas en audio. Se analizaron las transcripciones usando un análisis temático. Los análisis revelaron las decisiones duraderas sobre el manejo de la hipoacusia se realizaban luego de “encrucijadas críticas”, cuando la tensión negativa encontrada en el ambiente social y físico del participante sobrepasaba la energía positiva, o cuando la energía positiva que se hallaba en el ambiente del participante sobrepasaba la tensión negativa. Se describe el desarrollo en el tiempo de estos procesos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it