MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069422478 · doi:10.12745/et.14.2.875

‘The Pen lookes to be canoniz’d’: John Newdigate III, Author and Scribe

2011· article· en· W2069422478 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kirsten Inglis, Boyda Johnstone

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly Theatre · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagistrateAmateurHistoryLiteratureArtPerformance artVisual artsArt historyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide evidence for the authorship of a previously anonymous Caroline play, The Humorous Magistrate, currently held at the University of Calgary. Using the paleographic evidence of digital hand comparison charts, which compare exemplary letter-forms from handwritten documents, we contend that both versions of The Humorous Magistrate, along with numerous other plays and texts, were written and authored by John Newdigate III of Arbury Hall (1600-1642), a country gentleman working within a dynamic literary coterie based in the West Midlands. These hand charts map both the continuation and the evolution of his secretary and italic script, demonstrating that Newdigate was acutely attuned to the changing currents of early modern scribal culture. As author of The Humorous Magistrate and various other poems and plays, Newdigate can with reason be added to the group of amateur Caroline dramatists which includes the likes of John Suckling, Mildmay Fane, and William Cavendish.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly TheatreSame topicHistorical Influence and DiplomacyFrench-language works237,207