Rietveld structure refinement of NH4-exchanged natural chabazite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work the results of the X-ray Rietveld structure refinement of a natural and the corresponding NH 4 -exchanged chabazite from Nova Scotia (Canada) are exposed. Experimental data were collected using a laboratory powder diffractometer equipped with copper tube and graphite crystal monochromator. The outcome of this crystal-structure study is useful for (i) understanding the structure modifications induced by the NH 4 + exchange; (ii) understanding the physical-chemical and technological properties of NH 4 -chabazite, a zeolite vastly used for industrial applications; (iii) understanding the mechanism of proton conductivity of the NH 4 -exchanged zeolites, precursors of catalytically active H + forms. The position and orientation of the NH 4 + ion were initially refined using the rigid body model and later with the aid of soft constraints. The coordination number of the ammonium ion is 9 with two equally possible and mutually exclusive configurations. One coordination environment includes 3 oxygen atoms O3, 3 oxygen atoms O4, and 3 H 2 O molecules W2a. The other environment includes 3 oxygen atoms O3, 3 oxygen atoms O4, and 3 H 2 O molecules W3. As already shown for other NH 4 -zeolites, the N-O distances are larger than the N-H 2 O distances. The local geometry of the ammonium ion points to a monodentate configuration. A bidentate configuration of the hydrogen bonds for NH 4 + is also possible if the long H2…O3 separation is considered to be at bond distance. For industrial and technological applications, knowledge of the local environment of NH 4 + in the cavities of zeolites is important. Weak hydrogen bonds with framework oxygen atoms implies that the ammonium molecule can be easily exchanged or desorbed. This property is attractive for agronomy, horticulture and soil remediation where zeolite can be added to chemical fertilizers to improve the soil9s chemical and physical properties for plant growth, to increase fertilizer efficiency and to reduce the leaching of nutrients, to reduce the dissolution rate of a soluble fertilizer via ion exchange or combination of mineral dissolution and ion exchange, and to act as remediation agents in soils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".