MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069466651 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2010.5496303

A semi-closed form solution to the SNR balancing problem of two-way relay network beamforming

2010· article· en· W2069466651 on OpenAlexaff
Shahram Shahbazpanahi, Min Dong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamformingRelayComputer scienceClosed-form expressionContext (archaeology)Simple (philosophy)BisectionComputational complexity theoryMathematical optimizationTransceiverPower (physics)Bisection methodTransmitter power outputAlgorithmMathematicsTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)Wireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a semi-closed form solution to the SNR balancing problem, first considered in, in the context of network beamforming design for two-way relay networks. This solution relies on a simple bisection method to obtain the transmit power of one of the two transceivers. Given this transmit power, the relay beamforming weight vector is shown to have a closed-form solution. Simulation results show that the proposed solution has significantly lower computational complexity. We also present a suboptimal solution which does not use the aforementioned bisection algorithm while performs very closely to the optimal beamformer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207