Protoplast preparation and regeneration from spores of the biocontrol fungus<i>Pseudozyma flocculosa</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a specific protocol for yielding and regenerating protoplasts from spores of the recently described powdery mildew biocontrol agent Pseudozyma flocculosa. With this protocol, a large quantity of protoplasts was obtained from beta-mercaptoethanol-pretreated spores in 3-day-old cultures of P. flocculosa grown in YMPD. Enzymatic digestion was optimal with 0.5% Novozym 234 and 5% Glucanex prepared in 0.6 M KCl in 0.1 M citrate buffer. All liberated protoplasts fluoresced in the presence of fluorescein diacetate indicating that viability was nearly 100%. The regeneration rate was equally outstanding reaching 75% when 0.8 M sucrose was used as osmotic stabilizer in the regeneration medium. This protocol will find useful applications in genetic studies of this poorly characterized and understood biocontrol agent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".