Samarium complexes of a σ-/π-pyrrolide/arene based macrocyclic ligand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A bis-pyrrolide macrocyclic ligand [L = trans-calix[2]benzene[2]pyrrole(H)] containing two aromatic phenyl rings in the macrocycle backbone was reacted with SmCl(3)(THF)(3) to afford the corresponding [LSm(III)Cl] (1) complex. Its crystal structure showed the ligand adopting the sigma-bonding mode with the pyrrolide moieties and the pi-bonding with the two aromatic rings. Reaction of 1 with MeLi in THF gave a mixture of two compounds. The major was a C-H activated complex [LSm(III)(THF)] (2a) where the bonding mode of the pyrrolide rings was switched from sigma- to pi- as a result of the deprotonation and metallation of one of the two aromatic rings. The minor component was an unusual [(L)Sm(III)(HL')] (2b) complex containing both a regular ligand and an "N-confused" macrocyclic ligand. The two ligands wrapped the Sm center with the regular ligand adopting a bonding mode similar to 1. The second ligand instead acted as a simple sigma-bonded monodentate ligand, only using one nitrogen atom of one pyrrolide ring. However, this particular pyrrolide moiety has been isomerized by shifting the ring attachment to the macrocycle (N-confused system). In addition, the second pyrrolide ring has been protonated at the nitrogen atom. Complex 2b was obtained as major compound and in analytically pure form by reacting 1 with NaH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".